Issues and Ethics:

Reporting Back Personal Exposure Biomonitoring Results

Tuesday, September 16

8:00 am – 3:30 pm

Kehoe Auditorium

Kettering Building

             

 

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Department of Environmental Health at the University of Cincinnati invite you to join us in a workshop to identify issues surrounding reporting back personal exposure biomonitoring results to study participants.

 Workshop Program

Is It Safe? Reporting Personal Exposure Results to Study Participants When Science is Uncertain

Julia Brody, PhD, Silent Spring Institute

Julia Brody, PhD, is executive director of Silent Spring Institute and the principal investigator of the Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study, which began in 1994.  The study tested for 89 endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in air and dust from 120 homes and in women’s urine and reported individual results to participants, later interviewing them about their experience in receiving the results. Brody’s research also focuses on public engagement in science.  Her work is supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Science Foundation, among others.  She earned her Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin and her A.B. at Harvard University. 

Successful Use of a "Community-First" Method of Reporting Research Results to an Affected Group

Edward Emmett, MD, MS

University of Pennsylvania

Edward Emmett, MD, MS is Professor and Deputy Director of the Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia.  His research activities include studies of the role of toxic exposures in causing disease, including a major study of PFOA exposure to persons living in Little Hocking, Ohio.  Measurements of levels of C8 in the blood and breast milk of the exposed population have been made, and reported back to study participants.  Dr. Emmett included members of the community in planning the study methods and the communication of results.

 

Perspectives from the IRB

UC IRB representatives

 Sharing Unexpected Biomarker Results

Ann Hernick, Community Advocate 

Requests for Results, Years after the End of the Study: The Lead Cohort Experience

Kim Dietrich, PhD, U.C. Col of Medicine

 Break out groups to discuss:

“We Did…”“We Didn’t…, or We’re thinking about it ….”

Studies that did and didn’t report back, rationale and communication tools used.

 

Panel response:

Joyce Martin, JD, NIEHS

Everett (Chip) Lehman, NIOSH

IRB members 

A PDF file of the brochure is available here.

Please contact Dr. Susan Pinney, Director IHS Core, for additional information
susan.pinney@uc.edu
513.558.0684


This workshop is a follow-up to the NIEHS Town Meeting "Your Home, Your Health, Your Voice" on September 15, 2008.

 


 

 


 

Copyright 2007| Department of Environmental Health| University of Cincinnati | Comments please  email Web Master|
Last updated:  August 13 2009| 
Departmental Site Map